|
The Bishop of Ebbsfleet's Chrism Mass Homily 2001
|
AY I SAY how pleased I am to see you all
today? It's particularly good to see many lay people here, supporting your
clergy. Though the Mass today - as always - is a celebration of the whole
People of God, I am going to speak particularly to the clergy in this sermon.
The Chrism Mass is meant to equip the clergy for the tasks ahead. It is the
occasion on which some of the clergy's tools of the trade - the oils of
exorcism, healing and chrism - are blessed and consecrated. It is an
opportunity for the renewal of the clergy's ordination vows. It is - most
importantly - a preparation for the clergy - bishop, priests and deacons - to
lead the whole people of God in the renewal of baptismal vows during the Easter
liturgy.
It is an opportunity for the bishop to teach rather than 'just say a few
words'. So I make no apology about talking primarily to the clergy - though I
hope what I have to say is of general interest too - and for taking a little
longer than usual on this important occasion. In fact, like an ordinand or
junior curate, I am going to preach what are effectively two sermons in one,
one after the other, but deliberately.
Christ has freed us from our sins by his blood and made us a kingdom,
priests to his God and Father.
Revelation 1
My Lent book this year has been Dermot Power's A Spiritual Theology of the
Priesthood. Sub-titled 'The Mystery of Christ and the Mission of the Priest',
this book is built on the theology of Hans Urs von Balthasar, the pope's
favourite theologian. One of its tasks is to investigate the relationship
between the priesthood of the ordained ministry and the priesthood of all
believers. We all know what happens when the relationship between these two
priesthoods is out of kilter. On the one hand we have had phrases like 'going
into the Church' as a description of getting ordained - as if lay people
weren't members of the Church. On the other hand we have had the notion that
the minister in the pulpit or the clergyman at the altar is no different from
anyone else. This leads, not least, to ideas of lay presidency at the
Eucharist.
False distinctions between ontology and function have been drawn. How can you
be something without having specific tasks and responsibilities? How can
you do a series of different things without being the person who in some
sense is set apart to do them?
Part of the glory of the Catholic faith is that we Catholic priests, by and
large, don't spend our time wondering who we are or what our job is. We know
that we are called to share in the priesthood of Christ. We are called in the
very specific sense of being the priest, the person who presides at the
celebration of the Eucharist, a service which itself commemorates and
represents the sacrifice of Christ - the meal, the death, the resurrection and
the exaltation.
And, of course, we know that a priest must be a man ... . The story the priest
ritually acts out is that of a young man dying a violent death, a man whose
death challenged and refocused male heroism, a man whose self-offering
redefined and gave new meaning to sacrifice. The sacrifice that had been
offered by priests in the past was a virile, bloody business with the
life-blood of bulls and goats. The sacrifice offered once for all by Christ our
High Priest was the pouring out of his own life-blood. What a different
religion ours would be if a female priesthood were to give birth to the
Messiah's body and blood on the altar! Instead we have the sacrificial breaking
of the body and the pouring out of the blood. In the words of Pope St Leo the
Great we have 'a full, clear sacramental rite' in place of 'what was done only
in the Jewish temple and in signs and shadows'. We might like a religion of
birth and re-incarnation. We have instead a religion of death and
resurrection.
Louis Bouyer explores the relationship of priests and people in these words,
quoted by Dermot Power:
When we see the priest in the midst of his brothers in Christ celebrating
the Eucharist with men, it should be manifest that this ministerial priesthood,
the sacramental sign in our midst of the one priesthood of Christ, far from
making useless or void the royal priesthood of all believers, has no other
meaning or object but to make it fully actualized.
The text I used at the beginning of this sermon is applicable equally to the
priesthood of the clergy and to the priesthood of all the baptized.
Christ has freed us from our sins by his blood and made us a kingdom,
priests to his God and Father.
Revelation 1
Both meanings of priesthood apply to other parts of today's readings, for
instance these words of Isaiah:
You shall be called the priests of the Lord, men shall speak of you as
the ministers of our God.
Isaiah 61
and these words of the Lord in the Gospel:
'The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to preach
good news to the poor. He has sent me to proclaim release to the captives and
recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty those who are oppressed, to
proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord.'
Luke 4
Clergy and all the baptized are 'ministers of our God'. Clergy and all the
baptized have been freed from their sins by Christ's blood and have been made a
kingdom, priests to his God and Father. Clergy and all the baptized have the
task of proclaiming 'release to the captives and recovering of sight to the
blind', setting 'at liberty those who are oppressed' and proclaiming 'the
acceptable year of the Lord.' To this end clergy and all the baptized have been
anointed to preach by the Spirit of the Lord.
I could spend the rest of the sermon continuing to investigate the relationship
of the ministerial priesthood with the priesthood of all the baptized. Instead
I am going to assume that, thanks not least to Lumen Gentium and Presbyterorum
Ordinis, the relationship between the ordained ministry and the ministry of the
whole People of God has never been so clear. I am going to move on, then, in
part two, to ask how we can and should proceed in what I like to call 'the
apostolic district of Ebbsfleet', the community of those who look to the Bishop
of Ebbsfleet for 'extended episcopal care'.
And here I have a number of points to make - seven in all, each very short:
First, we have not withdrawn and are not withdrawing from the
structures of the Church of England. We continue to take part in chapters and
synods, to sit on diocesan committees, to contribute to the ecclesiastical
context in which we have a place. We are not a 'continuing church' or a new
church but, we believe, the authentic expression of the Church of England - a
church which looks back to Augustine and Ebbsfleet and which continues to
minister to English people in and through the parochial system. We lead by
example and not by separation, and I applaud those of you who are realizing
this. By all means arrive late to things and leave early, but do go!
Second, there is a community of priests, deacons and lay people
which looks to the Bishop of Ebbsfleet for oversight in spiritual matters. In
these churches - the Resolution C parishes - the president of the Eucharist is
normally but not usually the Bishop of Ebbsfleet, on whose behalf his deputies
the priests usually but not normally preside.
Third, there is a very large number of people - priests and
people - who are not in Resolution C parishes but who - wholly or partly - look
to the Bishop of Ebbsfleet for episcopal care. Some are helped by me being an
assistant bishop of this and that diocese. Others have a more fragmentary and
partial access to extended episcopal care. But, let's be clear, some of the
most valuable ministry we do is in places where hell will freeze over before
any resolutions can be passed.
Fourth, we are now into what I like to call 'the second
generation of PEVs'. (In this sense I believe that I am continuing with Bishop
Michael's vision rather than inventing my own). Our task is to call the
constituency to community, to a renewed ecclesial life. We need to become
nothing less than 'the local church', as that is understood in catholic
ecclesiology. How else can we develop ecumenical and fraternal relationships
with other local churches? We must not be a gathering of the disaffected. We
must become a 'local church' in the classical sense of that phrase.
Fifth of my seven points: this renewed ecclesial life will
require another look at structures. Some of you meet in alternative chapters,
others under the flag of Forward in Faith, the SSC, the FCP, the Boys' Brigade
or the Church Union. All this is very good but there is less clarity than I
should like to see. I want to see nothing less than a comprehensive network of
Ebbsfleet chapters for the clergy and a representative Lay Congress for the
laity. The Ebbsfleet chapters will include Resolution C incumbents and curates
as full members and other clergy, stipendiary and retired, as associate
members. The Lay Congress will not be a legislative body but a place of
meeting, a place of encouragement, a place of learning and mutual up-building -
a new model for lay synodical participation. Just as the Council of Priests
emerges from and sustains the Ebbsfleet Chapters, a lay council will emerge
from and sustain the Lay Congress. My Priest Secretary, Fr Spilsbury, is
charged with setting all this up for me.
Sixth, I think we need to intensify our efforts to persuade the
Resolution A and B parishes in our church to move on and become Resolution C
parishes. This is not because we necessarily need more and more parishes. It's
because we need to be able to say to folk up and down the country, 'This is
where you can go to church and be confident that the preaching is biblical,
that the sacraments are Catholic sacraments'.
Lastly - and perhaps most important of all - the second
generation of Provincial Episcopal Visitors will be looking to you to move on
from a time of bitterness and grief. It is time again to 'Rejoice in the Lord'
who is doing marvelous things through us. Our priorities should not be the
Women Bishops' Debate, the running out of the Roman Option Fast Track or the
ending of the special provisions for those who resign under the Priests
(Ordination of Women) Measure. If we are to become truly a local church, a
branch of the Church Universal, we must move beyond politics and on to the
business of being authentically the ordained ministry and the priesthood of all
the baptized. Our priority must be to preach the Lord Jesus Christ and him
crucified. This priority is served by evangelism, catechesis, spirituality and
the faithful celebration of the sacraments. I want the Ebbsfleet parishes to be
shop-windows of worship, power-houses of preaching, exemplars of Christian love
and places where people know their Faith and are unafraid to share it with
others.
In short, and to return to the point at which this sermon began, I want the
Ebbsfleet parishes to be models of how the ministerial priesthood and the
priesthood of all the faithful work together with mutual up-building for the
fulfilling of the kingdom of Jesus Christ.
Christ has freed us from our sins by his blood and made us a kingdom,
priests to his God and Father.
Revelation 1
The Bishop of Ebbsfleet
Bishop's House, Dry Sandford, Abingdon, OXON OX13 6JP
Tel: +44 (0) 1865 390746
Email enquiries
All text and images on the web site of the See of Ebbsfleet are
© The Bishop of Ebbsfleet unless otherwise acknowledged.
The menu system is the intellectual property of www.milonic.com
|